Betekenis van:
case history

case history
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • medisch dossier
  • detailed record of the background of a person or group under study or treatment

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

case history
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • voorafgaande gebeurtenissen
  • detailed record of the background of a person or group under study or treatment

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen

case history
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • ziekteverloop, ziektegeschiedenis, ziekteproces
  • detailed record of the background of a person or group under study or treatment

Hyperoniemen

Hyponiemen


Voorbeeldzinnen

  1. case history (as full as possible), including occurrence and course of any intercurrent diseases;
  2. In the case of rehoming, relevant veterinary care and social information from the individual history file referred to in paragraph 2 shall accompany the animal.
  3. In the case of living donors, the health professional responsible for obtaining the health history must ensure that the donor has:
  4. History, clinical evidence, or laboratory evidence of HIV, acute or chronic hepatitis B (except in the case of persons with a proven immune status), hepatitis C and HTLV I/II, transmission risk or evidence of risk factors for these infections.
  5. An infant with positive laboratory criteria only without a history of rubella in the mother during the pregnancy and without ‘A’ clinical criteria will therefore be reported as rubella case.
  6. In addition, in the case of a deceased donor, and in the case of a living donor when justified, a physical examination of the body must be performed to detect any signs that may be sufficient in themselves to exclude the donor or which must be assessed in the light of the donor’s medical and personal history.
  7. the evidence that the R&D expenses of the beneficiary represent at least 15 % of its total operating expenses in at least one of the three years preceding the granting of the aid or in the case of a start-up enterprise without any financial history, in the audit of its current fiscal period, as certified by an external auditor.
  8. Selection criteria for allogeneic living donors must be established and documented by the tissue establishment (and the transplanting clinician in the case of direct distribution to the recipient), based on the specific tissue or cells to be donated, together with the donor’s physical status and medical and behavioural history and the results of clinical investigations and laboratory tests establishing the donor’s state of health.
  9.  the evidence that the R & D expenses of the beneficiary represent at least 15 % of its total operating expenses in at least one of the three years preceding the granting of the aid or in the case of a start-up enterprise without any financial history, in the audit of its current fiscal period, as certified by an external auditor.
  10. To conclude, the Commission takes the view that in this case, considering the long history of attempting to maintain the company’s financial liquidity under State ownership and the fact that the yard was eventually privatised, an own contribution of 40 % is sufficiently significant and ensures that the aid is limited to the minimum necessary to enable restructuring of Gdańsk Shipyard and its return to viability.
  11. That different mineralogical processes may use different raw materials, and that the ceramic process may be irreversible, are considerations which are irrelevant in this context. (40) Moreover, from the parliamentary history of the Act it emerges that the objective of the intended measure is to improve the international competitive position of the ceramic industry in the Netherlands [21]. The case-law of the Court of Justice makes it clear that the fact that a measure may bring charges in a particular sector more closely into line with those of competitors in other Member States does not alter the fact that it constitutes aid [22].
  12. if the infected animal has been introduced from another holding, a Member State may decide, based on the history of the case, to apply eradication measures in the holding of origin in addition to, or instead of, the holding in which the infection was confirmed; in the case of land used for common grazing by more than one flock, Member States may decide to limit the application of those measures to a single flock, based on a reasoned consideration of all the epidemiological factors; where more than one flock is kept on a single holding, Member States may decide to limit the application of the measures to the flock in which scrapie has been confirmed, provided it has been verified that the flocks have been kept isolated from each other and that the spread of infection between the flocks through either direct or indirect contact is unlikely;